Simon Quilty’s proposal to manage Australia’s beef quota to China
A proposal to implement a self-managed system for Australia’s beef export quota to China is gaining traction within the industry. The initiative was developed by analyst Simon Quilty in response to the new safeguard mechanism announced by Chinese authorities, Beef Central reported.
In Australia’s case, the quota for 2026 was set at 205,000 tons. Once that volume is exceeded, exports will be subject to a 55% tariff, a level widely regarded by the industry as effectively prohibitive. Without an internal management scheme, there is a risk that the quota could be filled very early in the year—possibly by April or May—under a “first come, first served” approach, leaving the Chinese market without Australian beef, particularly higher-value products, for much of the year.
Quilty’s proposal outlines an industry self-managed quota system overseen by the Australian government, under which allocations would be based on each exporter’s historical shipment volumes. For 2026, allocations would be calculated using exports from the previous 12 months; for 2027, on a two-year average; and for 2028, on a rolling three-year average. Should the scheme extend beyond that period, allocations would continue to be determined on a three-year rolling basis.
One of the central objectives is to protect higher-value segments of the business—chilled beef and premium cuts from both grassfed and grainfed animals—and to prevent the quota from being “wasted” on low-value products such as trimmings or bones. Under the proposed system, quotas would be tradeable between establishments, allowing exporters traditionally focused on lower-value products to sell their allocation to operators targeting higher-quality beef, receiving financial compensation in return.
Quilty warns that without this type of management, the negative impact on cattle and beef prices could be significant. By contrast, the scheme would allow Australia to maintain a continuous presence in the Chinese market throughout the year, at a time when other major suppliers are likely to quickly exhaust their quotas and exit the market, pushing Chinese domestic prices higher in the second half of the year.
The Australian industry has prior experience with similar schemes, both in the United States and South Korea, where quota management helped bring order to trade flows and stabilize prices. According to Quilty, urgency is critical: the longer implementation is delayed, the greater the potential damage to Australia’s positioning in a strategic market such as China.
